Can any manager authorize destroying records, or does it have to be someone specific?
Short answer: destroying records is not something just any manager can decide on their own. In a sound records program, destruction is governed by an approved records retention schedule and a defined disposition authority — not by individual discretion.
Authority Comes from the Schedule, Not the Person
A retention schedule is the formal instrument that authorizes destruction. It states what record types an organization holds, how long each must be kept, and what happens at the end of that period. When a record reaches the end of its approved retention and no holds apply, destruction is authorized by the schedule — regardless of who pushes the button.
This is an important distinction. The legitimacy of a disposition decision rests on the documented rule, not on a manager’s personal judgment that something is “no longer needed.” A manager who deletes records outside an approved schedule may be creating legal and compliance exposure rather than reducing it.
Who Approves and Who Executes
Most organizations separate two roles:
- Approving the schedule — Setting retention periods and disposition rules is a governance function, often involving a records manager, legal counsel, and senior leadership. In government, schedules typically require approval by a designated authority (in the U.S. federal context, the National Archives).
- Executing disposition — Once the schedule exists, designated staff carry out destruction following the documented process. Their authority is delegated and procedural, not discretionary.
Before Anything Is Destroyed
Even with schedule authority, destruction should be paused when a legal hold, audit, investigation, or open records (FOIA-type) request applies. Holds override routine disposition.
Good practice also calls for documenting each destruction — what was destroyed, under which schedule item, by whom, and when — so the program can demonstrate that disposition was authorized and defensible. International guidance (ISO 15489) treats this controlled, documented disposition as a core records-management requirement.
Bottom Line
A single manager generally cannot authorize destruction on their own. Destruction should flow from an approved retention schedule, be carried out by designated staff, respect any holds, and be documented. For more on how schedules and disposition work together, see the retention and disposition topic hub.
Sources & further reading
Authoritative government and non-profit references.
- Records management policy and guidance — National Archives (NARA)
- ISO 15489-1 Records management — ISO
How to cite this page
APA
RM University Editorial. (2026). Can any manager authorize destroying records, or does it have to be someone specific?. Records Management University. https://www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/can-any-manager-authorize-destroying-records/
MLA
RM University Editorial. "Can any manager authorize destroying records, or does it have to be someone specific?." Records Management University, 16 June 2026, www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/can-any-manager-authorize-destroying-records/.
Related questions
- Can a company be fined for keeping records longer than the law requires?
- Can deleting emails too soon be considered illegal spoliation of evidence?
- Can different copies of the same document have different retention periods?
- Can GDPR storage limitation requirements force you to delete records you are legally required to keep elsewhere?
- Can I just delete old records whenever I need to free up storage space?