Can I just adopt ISO 15489 word-for-word as our records policy, or does it not work that way?
Short answer: no, and that is by design. ISO 15489 is a framework, not a fill-in-the-blanks policy. Adopting it word-for-word would leave you with a document full of principles but no operational instructions your organization can actually follow.
What ISO 15489 actually is
ISO 15489-1, “Information and documentation — Records management,” sets out concepts and principles for creating, capturing, and managing authentic, reliable, and usable records over time. It tells you what good records management looks like and why it matters. It deliberately stays technology-neutral and organization-neutral so it can apply across industries, sectors, and countries.
Because of that generality, the standard does not — and cannot — contain the specifics your policy needs: who owns records, which retention periods apply, what systems you use, or how you handle disposition and legal holds.
Why copying it does not work
A workable records policy has to reflect things ISO 15489 leaves to you:
- Legal and regulatory requirements. Your retention obligations come from statutes, regulators, and sometimes litigation needs — not from the standard. These vary by jurisdiction and record type.
- Your record types and business processes. The standard will not name your contracts, case files, or email categories.
- Roles and accountability. Someone in your organization must own the program; the standard only says accountability should exist.
- Systems and controls. Capture, classification, access, and disposition all depend on tools and workflows you operate.
How to use it correctly
Treat ISO 15489 as the backbone, then build outward:
- Adopt its principles — authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability — as your stated objectives.
- Map your legal and regulatory drivers to specific record categories and retention rules.
- Translate principles into procedures people can execute: how records are captured, classified, secured, retained, and disposed.
- Assign ownership and review cycles so the policy stays current.
You can reference ISO 15489 in your policy to show alignment with recognized good practice, and pair it with companion standards (such as ISO 16175 for digital environments) where relevant. But the operational substance has to be yours.
For more on building defensible, requirement-driven policy, see the compliance and standards hub.
Sources & further reading
Authoritative government and non-profit references.
- ISO 15489-1 Records management — ISO
- Records management policy and guidance — National Archives (NARA)
How to cite this page
APA
RM University Editorial. (2026). Can I just adopt ISO 15489 word-for-word as our records policy, or does it not work that way?. Records Management University. https://www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/can-i-adopt-iso-15489-word-for-word-as-our-policy/
MLA
RM University Editorial. "Can I just adopt ISO 15489 word-for-word as our records policy, or does it not work that way?." Records Management University, 16 June 2026, www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/can-i-adopt-iso-15489-word-for-word-as-our-policy/.
Related questions
- Can a commercial off-the-shelf system meet the NARA Universal ERM Requirements without being DoD 5015.2 certified?
- Can a company be fined or sanctioned for not following ISO 15489 in a lawsuit?
- Can a US company store its records on servers in another country, and what cross-border data rules apply?
- Can following ISO 15489 actually help us pass an audit or hold up in court?
- Can I just pick whichever records standard is easiest, since DoD 5015.2, ISO 15489, and ISO 16175 all basically do the same thing?