How do you build a privilege log during the review stage and what has to be on it under FRCP 26(b)(5)?
A privilege log is the record that explains why you are withholding documents that would otherwise be responsive in discovery. It is produced during the review stage of e-discovery, after collected material has been processed and reviewers begin coding documents for responsiveness and privilege.
Why FRCP 26(b)(5) requires it
Under the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party that withholds information by claiming it is privileged or protected as trial-preparation (work-product) material must do two things: (1) expressly make the claim, and (2) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or things in a way that, without revealing the privileged content itself, lets other parties assess the claim. The privilege log is how parties satisfy that second obligation. Failing to log adequately can risk waiver, so accuracy matters.
Building the log during review
The log is a byproduct of disciplined review coding. As reviewers flag documents, capture the basis for each privilege call so the log can be generated rather than reconstructed later.
A typical entry describes enough to evaluate the claim without disclosing it:
- Identifier — a unique document or control number.
- Date of the communication or document.
- Author/sender and recipients, including any cc/bcc, so the attorney-client or work-product relationship is visible.
- Document type (email, memo, draft).
- Privilege asserted — attorney-client, work-product, or another recognized protection.
- Subject-matter description — enough to show the claim is justified, but not the substance itself.
Practical guidance
Standardize how reviewers record privilege so entries are consistent. Watch for redactions (partially privileged documents) and for email threads and attachments, which often need entry-level treatment. Parties increasingly negotiate the log’s format and scope (including categorical logging) early, often in the meet-and-confer or a protective order, to control cost.
Note that requirements differ by jurisdiction. State courts and other countries have their own rules and expectations, and a court’s local rules or a case-specific order may impose additional detail. Confirm the governing standard before finalizing any log, and consult counsel on privilege determinations.
Sources & further reading
Authoritative government and non-profit references.
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure — U.S. Courts
- The Sedona Conference publications — The Sedona Conference
How to cite this page
APA
RM University Editorial. (2026). How do you build a privilege log during the review stage and what has to be on it under FRCP 26(b)(5)?. Records Management University. https://www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/how-to-build-a-privilege-log-during-ediscovery-review/
MLA
RM University Editorial. "How do you build a privilege log during the review stage and what has to be on it under FRCP 26(b)(5)?." Records Management University, 16 June 2026, www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/how-to-build-a-privilege-log-during-ediscovery-review/.
Related questions
- A key custodian left the company—how do we preserve and collect their email and files after they're gone?
- An employee admitted to deleting emails relevant to a lawsuit—what do we do now?
- Are curative measures or monetary fines available when lost data can be replaced through other sources?
- Can a company be sanctioned for spoliation when an employee auto-deleted text messages or ephemeral chats?
- Can a court order cost-shifting or limit search terms when keyword searches return an unmanageable hit count?