Is it true that if my IT department backs up our servers, the agency doesn't also need a separate records management system?
No. This is one of the most common misconceptions about recordkeeping, and acting on it can leave an agency out of compliance. IT backups and a records management program serve fundamentally different purposes. A backup may hold copies of your data, but it does not satisfy your obligation to manage records.
Backups and records management are not the same thing
A backup is a disaster-recovery tool. Its job is to restore systems to a working state after hardware failure, corruption, accidental deletion, or a cyber incident. Backups are typically organized by system, captured on a rolling schedule, and overwritten or rotated out after a short period.
A records management program, by contrast, exists to ensure that records are identified, captured, retained for their full legally required period, made findable, and disposed of properly when their retention expires. These are governance obligations, not storage mechanics.
What backups generally cannot do
Relying on backups alone usually leaves critical gaps:
- Retention and scheduling. Records often must be kept for specific periods under an approved records schedule. Backup rotation cycles are unrelated to those retention requirements and frequently destroy records too soon, or keep them long past lawful disposition.
- Findability and access. Backups are designed for bulk restore, not for locating a specific record to answer a FOIA request, a Privacy Act request, litigation hold, or an audit.
- Authenticity and context. Sound recordkeeping preserves metadata, version history, and the relationships that make a record trustworthy and usable as evidence. Raw backups typically do not.
- Lawful disposition. Records must be deleted or transferred only under an authorized schedule. Ad hoc backup deletion is not a defensible disposition process.
The bottom line
Federal agencies are obligated to create and maintain records that document their organization, functions, and decisions, and to manage them throughout their lifecycle. Backups support continuity of operations and complement a records program, but they do not replace one. An agency still needs defined policies, an approved records schedule, and a way to manage records from creation through final disposition.
In short: keep your backups for resilience, and maintain a records management program for compliance. They work together, but one cannot stand in for the other.
Learn more at the federal records topic hub.
Sources & further reading
Authoritative government and non-profit references.
- Records management (NARA) — National Archives (NARA)
- Records management laws — National Archives (NARA)
How to cite this page
APA
RM University Editorial. (2026). Is it true that if my IT department backs up our servers, the agency doesn't also need a separate records management system?. Records Management University. https://www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/is-it-must-an-agency-have-records-system-if-it-already-backs-up-servers/
MLA
RM University Editorial. "Is it true that if my IT department backs up our servers, the agency doesn't also need a separate records management system?." Records Management University, 16 June 2026, www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/is-it-must-an-agency-have-records-system-if-it-already-backs-up-servers/.
Related questions
- Are records created by federal contractors considered federal records?
- Big-bucket vs item-level retention schedules: how do I decide which approach to use?
- Can a federal employee be personally fined or jailed for deleting government records?
- Can federal employees conduct official business on personal devices or apps?
- Can I delete old federal records to free up storage space when our shared drive gets full?