Should I digitize old microfilm and microfiche?
Digitizing microfilm and microfiche is often worthwhile, but it is a project to plan deliberately, not a default to apply to everything. The right answer depends on how the film is used, what condition it is in, and what your retention obligations require.
When digitizing makes sense
Converting film to digital images is usually a good idea when:
- Access is the problem. Microfilm requires readers and physical handling. Digital images can be searched, indexed, shared, and integrated with other systems — a major improvement for frequently used records.
- The film is at risk. Older acetate and nitrate film can degrade, and reader hardware is increasingly hard to maintain. Digitizing captures the content before the medium or the equipment fails.
- The records have lasting value. High-value or high-use collections justify the cost of a quality conversion.
When to be cautious
Digitization is not free or automatic. Be deliberate when:
- The records have low value or are near the end of their retention period. It rarely makes sense to digitize material you can soon lawfully destroy.
- You expect digital to replace the film. Good microfilm, stored properly, is a stable preservation medium with a very long expected life. Digital files require active, ongoing management — format migration, integrity checks, and backups — to remain usable.
Do it to a standard
If you proceed, follow recognized capture guidelines for resolution, color, and metadata so the images are faithful, legible surrogates. Federal agencies and many other organizations look to FADGI technical guidelines. Plan the long-term care of the resulting files as a digital preservation effort, not a one-time scan.
Decide the originals up front
Confirm whether destroying the film afterward is authorized by an applicable retention schedule, and verify the digital copies before disposing of anything. Many organizations choose to retain the film as a preservation backup even after digitizing for access.
In short: digitize when it improves access or protects at-risk content and the records justify it — and treat the result as records to be preserved, not just files on a drive. See the digitization and imaging hub for more.
Sources & further reading
Authoritative government and non-profit references.
- FADGI digitization guidelines — FADGI
- Digital preservation (Library of Congress) — Library of Congress
How to cite this page
APA
RM University Editorial. (2026). Should I digitize old microfilm and microfiche?. Records Management University. https://www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/should-i-digitize-old-microfilm-and-microfiche/
MLA
RM University Editorial. "Should I digitize old microfilm and microfiche?." Records Management University, 16 June 2026, www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/should-i-digitize-old-microfilm-and-microfiche/.
Related questions
- Are Microsoft Copilot and ChatGPT outputs considered records, and how do you capture them?
- Are scanned copies legally admissible in the UK under the BS 10008 standard the same way they are in the US?
- Are scanned copies of documents admissible to the SEC and FINRA, and do broker-dealers still need WORM storage after digitizing?
- Are scanned documents legally admissible in court?
- Are there industries where scanning and shredding originals is prohibited by law?