Should I print important emails to file, or is the electronic version enough?
For most email, the electronic version is the record of value, and printing to paper is no longer the default best practice. Modern records guidance favors managing email electronically because the digital file preserves context that paper cannot.
Why the electronic version is usually preferred
An email is more than the words in its body. The electronic copy carries metadata, the transmission details, timestamps, sender and recipient routing, attachments in their native form, and links that establish authenticity and chain of custody. When you print to paper, much of that is lost or degraded. Attachments may not print cleanly, embedded links go dead, and the system data that proves who sent what, and when, disappears.
Electronic records also remain searchable, can be retained and disposed of automatically against a schedule, and can be produced more reliably for discovery, audits, and FOIA or public-records requests. The “print and file” habit grew out of older paper-based filing systems, not from any rule that paper is superior.
When printing might still make sense
There are narrow situations where a paper copy is appropriate:
- A signed document or wet signature where the physical artifact is the record.
- Local policy or a specific legal requirement that calls for a paper file.
- A working convenience copy, which should be treated as a non-record reference and not as the official record.
If you do print, treat the paper as a duplicate. Do not delete the authoritative electronic version unless your retention schedule says the paper copy is the record of record.
What to do instead
- Capture and manage email in an approved electronic system or repository.
- Apply your organization’s retention schedule so emails are kept and disposed of consistently.
- Keep the native format and attachments together so context is preserved.
- Avoid relying on individual inboxes as long-term storage.
The guiding principle is to keep the most complete, authentic, and usable version of the record. In nearly all cases, that is the electronic copy.
For more on managing message-based records, see the email and messaging topic hub.
Sources & further reading
Authoritative government and non-profit references.
- Records management policy and guidance — National Archives (NARA)
- ISO 15489-1 Records management — ISO
How to cite this page
APA
RM University Editorial. (2026). Should I print important emails to file, or is the electronic version enough?. Records Management University. https://www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/should-i-print-emails-to-file/
MLA
RM University Editorial. "Should I print important emails to file, or is the electronic version enough?." Records Management University, 16 June 2026, www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/should-i-print-emails-to-file/.
Related questions
- Are emails between teachers and parents considered education records under FERPA?
- Are emails in my Sent folder and Inbox both records, or just one copy?
- Are emails on my personal phone discoverable in a lawsuit?
- Are ephemeral or disappearing messages legal to use for work, or do they violate recordkeeping rules?
- Are text messages and chat business records?