What should we do if two offices give conflicting answers about whether responsive FOIA records exist?
When one office says responsive records exist and another says they do not, treat the conflict as a signal that the search is not yet complete, not as a tie to be broken by picking the more convenient answer. Under FOIA, an agency is responsible for conducting a reasonable, good-faith search across all locations likely to hold responsive records. A contradiction between offices usually means the search has gaps that must be resolved before any response goes out.
Treat It as One Agency, Not Two Opinions
FOIA obligations attach to the agency as a whole, not to individual offices. The fact that two components disagree does not relieve the agency of its duty to locate and account for responsive records wherever they reside.
- Designate a single coordinating point, typically the FOIA officer, to reconcile the responses.
- Require each office to document what it searched: which systems, custodians, date ranges, and search terms.
- Compare those descriptions directly. Conflicts often come from different scope assumptions, not from records genuinely existing in one place and not the other.
Resolve the Conflict on the Facts
Most disagreements dissolve once the searches are compared side by side.
- If one office searched broadly and another narrowly, expand the narrow search to match the request.
- If records moved, were consolidated, or were transferred between offices, follow them and confirm the current custodian.
- If a system was overlooked or a custodian was missed, search it before concluding records do not exist.
- Check retention schedules: a record properly disposed of under an approved schedule is genuinely gone, and that is a defensible answer when documented.
Document and Be Transparent
Keep a clear record of how the conflict was identified and resolved, including the searches performed and the basis for the final determination. This supports the adequacy of the search if it is later challenged on appeal or in litigation.
When records truly cannot be located after a reasonable search, the agency may issue a “no responsive records” response, but that conclusion should rest on a documented, agency-wide search rather than on one office’s word over another’s. Strong underlying recordkeeping makes these conflicts rarer and far easier to resolve.
For related guidance, see the FOIA and public records hub.
Sources & further reading
Authoritative government and non-profit references.
- FOIA frequently asked questions — FOIA.gov / U.S. DOJ
- Records management (NARA) — National Archives (NARA)
How to cite this page
APA
RM University Editorial. (2026). What should we do if two offices give conflicting answers about whether responsive FOIA records exist?. Records Management University. https://www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/what-to-do-if-two-offices-give-conflicting-answers-about-foia-records/
MLA
RM University Editorial. "What should we do if two offices give conflicting answers about whether responsive FOIA records exist?." Records Management University, 16 June 2026, www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/what-to-do-if-two-offices-give-conflicting-answers-about-foia-records/.
Related questions
- Am I supposed to get an acknowledgement letter after I file a FOIA request, and what should it contain?
- Are emails on a city council member's personal phone subject to state public records law?
- Are police body-camera footage and incident reports public records under state law?
- Are state university student disciplinary records subject to public records requests, or does FERPA block them?
- Can a business stop an agency from releasing its confidential information under FOIA (reverse FOIA)?