Who is responsible for approving the disposal of paper records after they have been digitized?
Disposing of paper originals after scanning is a formal records action, not a routine cleanup task. Because destruction is irreversible, most organizations require sign-off from one or more designated roles before the source documents leave the building or hit the shredder.
Who Holds the Authority
Approval of source-document disposal almost always rests with the records management function, typically the Records Manager, Records Officer, or an equivalent custodian of the organization’s records program. This person confirms that disposal aligns with the approved retention schedule and that no legal or business reason requires keeping the paper.
Several other parties commonly share responsibility:
- Legal counsel, who confirms that no litigation hold, audit, investigation, or regulatory requirement prevents destruction.
- Program or business owners, who verify the records have served their operational purpose.
- Senior leadership or a records authority, whose policy or delegation grants the program the right to authorize destruction.
In government settings, an external authority may also govern the action. In the U.S. federal space, for example, agencies must dispose of records only under a disposition authority approved by the National Archives, and digitization does not by itself eliminate that requirement.
What Must Be Verified Before Approval
Approval should not be granted on trust alone. Sound practice is to confirm that:
- The digital copies are complete, accurate, and legible, and capture all pages and content of the originals.
- The images are stored in a trustworthy, secure system with appropriate backups, metadata, and protection against alteration.
- The retention period for the record type permits disposal, and the paper is not the legally required copy.
- No hold of any kind applies to the records.
Quality assurance and a verified, authoritative digital surrogate are what make disposal of the paper defensible.
Why a Formal Process Matters
Treating the decision as a documented, multi-party approval protects the organization. It creates evidence that destruction followed policy and was authorized by accountable parties. International guidance on records management emphasizes that disposition should be a controlled, auditable process supported by clear authority and documentation, regardless of format.
For more on standards, quality checks, and program practices behind paper-to-digital conversion, see the digitization and imaging topic hub.
Sources & further reading
Authoritative government and non-profit references.
- Records management (NARA) — National Archives (NARA)
- ISO 15489-1 Records management — ISO
How to cite this page
APA
RM University Editorial. (2026). Who is responsible for approving the disposal of paper records after they have been digitized?. Records Management University. https://www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/who-approves-disposing-of-paper-after-digitization/
MLA
RM University Editorial. "Who is responsible for approving the disposal of paper records after they have been digitized?." Records Management University, 16 June 2026, www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/who-approves-disposing-of-paper-after-digitization/.
Related questions
- Are Microsoft Copilot and ChatGPT outputs considered records, and how do you capture them?
- Are scanned copies legally admissible in the UK under the BS 10008 standard the same way they are in the US?
- Are scanned copies of documents admissible to the SEC and FINRA, and do broker-dealers still need WORM storage after digitizing?
- Are scanned documents legally admissible in court?
- Are there industries where scanning and shredding originals is prohibited by law?