Do backup tapes and system backups have to be preserved when records on them are under a litigation hold?
The short answer is: sometimes, and it depends on what those backups actually contain. A litigation hold suspends routine destruction of any information that is reasonably relevant to anticipated or pending litigation. Whether that obligation reaches your backup tapes turns on whether the tapes hold relevant information that exists nowhere else.
The General Rule
Most organizations treat backup tapes as a disaster-recovery tool, not a recordkeeping system. They are typically recycled on a short rotation, and that routine cycling is usually acceptable. When a litigation hold attaches, however, the duty to preserve potentially relevant evidence overrides routine recycling for the data covered by the hold.
The key question is whether the relevant information is available elsewhere:
- If the same records exist in accessible, live systems and are properly preserved there, you generally do not need to also freeze the backup tapes.
- If a backup is the only remaining copy of relevant information — for example, data that was deleted from live systems — then that backup likely must be preserved.
Practical Steps
When a hold is issued, organizations should move quickly to:
- Identify the custodians, systems, and date ranges in scope.
- Determine whether any backups contain unique relevant data not preserved elsewhere.
- Suspend the recycling of those specific tapes or images, while documenting the decision.
- Avoid over-preserving — blanket freezes on all backups are costly and rarely required.
Records vs. Backups
It is worth distinguishing a backup from a record. A backup is a point-in-time copy made for continuity, while a record is information kept because of its content and value. Sound records management — retaining records in managed systems under approved schedules — reduces reliance on backups as evidence and makes hold compliance far simpler. Backups should not become a de facto, unmanaged archive.
Bottom Line
Backup tapes do not automatically have to be kept forever once a hold is in place, but they cannot be recycled if they hold the only copy of relevant information. Decide deliberately, document the reasoning, and coordinate closely with legal counsel before resuming any destruction. For broader context on managing recorded information, see the federal records topic hub.
Sources & further reading
Authoritative government and non-profit references.
- The Sedona Conference publications — The Sedona Conference
- Records management (NARA) — National Archives (NARA)
How to cite this page
APA
RM University Editorial. (2026). Do backup tapes and system backups have to be preserved when records on them are under a litigation hold?. Records Management University. https://www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/do-backups-need-to-be-preserved-under-litigation-hold/
MLA
RM University Editorial. "Do backup tapes and system backups have to be preserved when records on them are under a litigation hold?." Records Management University, 16 June 2026, www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/do-backups-need-to-be-preserved-under-litigation-hold/.
Related questions
- Are records created by federal contractors considered federal records?
- Big-bucket vs item-level retention schedules: how do I decide which approach to use?
- Can a federal employee be personally fined or jailed for deleting government records?
- Can federal employees conduct official business on personal devices or apps?
- Can I delete old federal records to free up storage space when our shared drive gets full?