What is the difference between event-based retention and time-based retention, and how do you set up each one?
Retention periods tell you how long a record must be kept before it can be destroyed or transferred. The key difference between the two main approaches is what starts the clock: a fixed calendar interval, or a triggering event.
Time-Based Retention
Time-based (or fixed-period) retention sets a defined length of time measured from a known starting point, such as the date a record is created, received, or filed. Once that period elapses, the record becomes eligible for its disposition action.
Examples in plain terms include keeping certain financial or tax records for a set number of years after the filing date, or retaining routine correspondence for a fixed term after creation.
This approach is the simplest to administer because the cutoff and destruction dates can be calculated automatically from the creation date.
Event-Based Retention
Event-based retention does not begin counting until a specific business event occurs. The retention “trigger” is the event; a fixed period often follows it.
Common triggers include:
- Contract expiration or termination
- Employee separation
- Closure of a case, matter, or project
- Disposal of an asset or product end-of-life
A rule might read “retain for X years after the contract ends.” Until the event is recorded, the record stays in an open, indefinite state.
Setting Up Each One
The setup process shares a common foundation: identify the record series, determine the legal, regulatory, and business requirements, and document the rule in an approved retention and disposition schedule.
For time-based rules:
- Define the start (creation, receipt, or fiscal-year cutoff)
- Set the duration and the disposition action
- Let the system calculate eligibility automatically
For event-based rules:
- Define the qualifying event precisely so it can be recognized consistently
- Establish how and where the event date is captured (a status field, a workflow, or a manual update)
- Apply any follow-on time period that runs from the event
The hardest part of event-based retention is reliably capturing the trigger. Records can sit in limbo if no one records that the event happened, so build the trigger into a process or system rather than relying on memory.
In practice, many schedules combine both: an event starts the clock, and a fixed period follows. Whichever you use, the rule should be approved, documented, and applied consistently across the records it governs.
Sources & further reading
Authoritative government and non-profit references.
- Records management policy and guidance — National Archives (NARA)
- ISO 15489-1 Records management — ISO
How to cite this page
APA
RM University Editorial. (2026). What is the difference between event-based retention and time-based retention, and how do you set up each one?. Records Management University. https://www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/event-based-vs-time-based-retention/
MLA
RM University Editorial. "What is the difference between event-based retention and time-based retention, and how do you set up each one?." Records Management University, 16 June 2026, www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/event-based-vs-time-based-retention/.
Related questions
- Can a company be fined for keeping records longer than the law requires?
- Can any manager authorize destroying records, or does it have to be someone specific?
- Can deleting emails too soon be considered illegal spoliation of evidence?
- Can different copies of the same document have different retention periods?
- Can GDPR storage limitation requirements force you to delete records you are legally required to keep elsewhere?