How do you keep a records retention program current as new technologies and collaboration tools keep emerging?
A retention program stays current not by predicting every new tool, but by being built on principles that outlast any specific technology. The goal is to manage records based on what they are and what they do for the organization, not on where they happen to live.
Anchor the program to content, not platform
A well-designed retention schedule classifies records by function and business value, not by application or file format. When a new collaboration tool appears, the question is simply: what record categories does it create? A chat thread that documents a decision, an approval captured in a workflow, or a shared document with policy content all map to existing retention categories. Keeping schedules “big bucket” and function-based means most new tools fit without rewriting the schedule.
Build a recurring review cycle
Treat the retention schedule as a living instrument. Establish a regular review cadence and trigger ad hoc reviews when:
- A new system or collaboration platform is adopted
- A business process changes materially
- A law, regulation, or oversight requirement is updated
- Litigation or audit reveals a gap
Document each review and its rationale so the program remains defensible.
Bring records management into technology decisions early
The most effective control is being at the table before a tool is deployed. Partner with IT, security, and procurement so that records implications, retention configuration, export capability, and disposition options are evaluated during selection — not retrofitted afterward. Tools that cannot enforce or export per retention rules create long-term risk.
Govern the new data types collaboration tools create
Emerging platforms generate records that traditional schedules overlooked: instant messages, channel posts, reactions, version histories, and metadata. Decide deliberately whether these are records, transitory information, or non-records, and apply consistent rules. Update policies and training so staff understand how everyday tools fit the program.
Standardize so change is manageable
Aligning to recognized practice — such as ISO 15489 and your applicable legal and regulatory framework — gives the program a stable backbone, so each new technology is an adjustment rather than a reinvention.
Explore related guidance on the retention and disposition hub. A current program is ultimately one that is reviewed on a schedule, governed by principle, and connected to how the organization actually adopts technology.
Sources & further reading
Authoritative government and non-profit references.
- Records management policy and guidance — National Archives (NARA)
- ISO 15489-1 Records management — ISO
How to cite this page
APA
RM University Editorial. (2026). How do you keep a records retention program current as new technologies and collaboration tools keep emerging?. Records Management University. https://www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/how-to-keep-a-records-program-current-as-new-technologies-emerge/
MLA
RM University Editorial. "How do you keep a records retention program current as new technologies and collaboration tools keep emerging?." Records Management University, 16 June 2026, www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/how-to-keep-a-records-program-current-as-new-technologies-emerge/.
Related questions
- Can a company be fined for keeping records longer than the law requires?
- Can any manager authorize destroying records, or does it have to be someone specific?
- Can deleting emails too soon be considered illegal spoliation of evidence?
- Can different copies of the same document have different retention periods?
- Can GDPR storage limitation requirements force you to delete records you are legally required to keep elsewhere?