How do I know if my records management software is actually compliant with the standards it claims to meet?
A vendor claim of “compliance” is a starting point for your evaluation, not the end of it. Compliance is rarely a single yes-or-no property of a product. It depends on how a system is configured, deployed, and operated in your environment. The goal is to move from a marketing claim to evidence you can verify.
Ask which standard, and which version
Begin by asking exactly what the claim refers to. A credible answer names a specific standard, the edition or version, and the date it was assessed against. Standards such as ISO 15489 and ISO 16175 describe functional and management requirements for records in digital environments, while government and sector rules may impose additional obligations. Vague phrasing like “fully compliant” without a named standard should prompt more questions, not reassurance.
Distinguish certification from self-assertion
Some compliance claims rest on independent testing or certification against a published specification; others are the vendor’s own assertion. Both can be legitimate, but they carry different weight. Ask:
- Was the assessment performed by the organization itself or by an independent party?
- Against which requirements, and is a test report or conformance statement available?
- Does the certification apply to the product version you will actually run?
Map requirements to features you can test
Translate each standard’s requirements into concrete capabilities, then confirm them in a working environment. Typical areas include reliable capture, classification, retention and disposition scheduling, audit trails that cannot be silently altered, access controls, and defensible deletion. Where possible, validate these against your own records and policies rather than a canned demo.
Remember that compliance is operational
Even well-designed software only stays compliant if it is configured and used correctly. Your retention schedules, security settings, and procedures are part of the compliant system. Standards and program guidance consistently emphasize that recordkeeping is governed by policy and practice, not by software alone.
Document your own due diligence
Keep a record of what you asked, what evidence you received, and how you tested it. This documentation supports your program’s own defensibility and helps during audits.
For related guidance, see the compliance and standards topic hub.
Sources & further reading
Authoritative government and non-profit references.
- ISO 16175 records in digital environments — ISO
- Records management policy and guidance — National Archives (NARA)
How to cite this page
APA
RM University Editorial. (2026). How do I know if my records management software is actually compliant with the standards it claims to meet?. Records Management University. https://www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/how-to-verify-records-software-compliance-claims/
MLA
RM University Editorial. "How do I know if my records management software is actually compliant with the standards it claims to meet?." Records Management University, 16 June 2026, www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/how-to-verify-records-software-compliance-claims/.
Related questions
- Can a commercial off-the-shelf system meet the NARA Universal ERM Requirements without being DoD 5015.2 certified?
- Can a company be fined or sanctioned for not following ISO 15489 in a lawsuit?
- Can a US company store its records on servers in another country, and what cross-border data rules apply?
- Can following ISO 15489 actually help us pass an audit or hold up in court?
- Can I just adopt ISO 15489 word-for-word as our records policy, or does it not work that way?