Which records management standard should a small organization start with if it has never followed one before?
A small organization with no prior framework is usually best served by starting with ISO 15489-1, the international standard for records management. It is principle-based rather than prescriptive, which makes it adaptable to organizations of almost any size or sector. Rather than dictating specific technology or rigid procedures, it describes what good recordkeeping looks like and lets you scale the practices to your resources.
Why ISO 15489 is a good starting point
ISO 15489 focuses on the core idea that records should be authentic, reliable, complete, and usable throughout their life. Building your program around those qualities gives you a durable foundation that other, more specialized standards can layer onto later. Because it is widely recognized internationally, adopting it also makes it easier to align with partners, auditors, and future regulatory expectations.
For organizations that are mostly working with digital records, it is worth pairing ISO 15489 with ISO 16175, which addresses records in digital environments. Together they cover both the principles and the practical handling of electronic records.
Practical first steps
You do not need to implement everything at once. A reasonable sequence is:
- Identify your records. Decide what counts as a record versus transitory material.
- Set retention rules. Determine how long each type must be kept, guided by applicable legal and operational requirements.
- Assign responsibility. Name who owns the program, even if it is a part-time duty.
- Document a simple policy. Write down how records are created, stored, accessed, and disposed of.
- Review periodically. Revisit the policy as the organization grows.
Don’t overlook legal retention requirements
A framework like ISO 15489 tells you how to manage records, but specific laws often tell you how long to keep certain ones. Tax, employment, and similar obligations apply regardless of which standard you adopt, so confirm those requirements as you build your retention rules.
Starting with one clear, scalable standard and expanding deliberately is far more sustainable than trying to adopt every guideline at once. For broader context on frameworks and obligations, see the compliance and standards topic hub.
Sources & further reading
Authoritative government and non-profit references.
How to cite this page
APA
RM University Editorial. (2026). Which records management standard should a small organization start with if it has never followed one before?. Records Management University. https://www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/which-records-standard-should-small-organization-start-with/
MLA
RM University Editorial. "Which records management standard should a small organization start with if it has never followed one before?." Records Management University, 16 June 2026, www.recordsmgmt.org/questions/which-records-standard-should-small-organization-start-with/.
Related questions
- Can a commercial off-the-shelf system meet the NARA Universal ERM Requirements without being DoD 5015.2 certified?
- Can a company be fined or sanctioned for not following ISO 15489 in a lawsuit?
- Can a US company store its records on servers in another country, and what cross-border data rules apply?
- Can following ISO 15489 actually help us pass an audit or hold up in court?
- Can I just adopt ISO 15489 word-for-word as our records policy, or does it not work that way?